NYU Cancels Speech on Cancel Culture Amid Security Concerns

News Summary

The cancellation of Ilya Shapiro’s speech on cancel culture at NYU due to security concerns has ignited debates on academic freedom and the treatment of controversial speakers. The event, intended to promote Shapiro’s book on legal education and cancel culture, faced backlash tied to its timing with a significant anniversary. Despite attempts to relocate, the university ultimately decided against holding the event, raising concerns about selective treatment of speakers and freedom of expression on campus.

New York – Legal scholar Ilya Shapiro’s scheduled speech on cancel culture and wokeness, meant to take place at New York University (NYU) on October 7, has been canceled due to security concerns. The cancellation has sparked significant discussion about academic freedom and the treatment of controversial speakers at universities.

The event was intended to promote Shapiro’s book titled Lawless: The Miseducation of American Elites, which contains accounts of various incidents of cancel culture within the context of elite law schools, including his own experiences. The timing of the event coincided with the two-year anniversary of a terrorist attack by Hamas on Israeli citizens, which compounded the decision to cancel. Shapiro, who is both Jewish and an ardent supporter of Israel, faced significant backlash that prompted the cancellation.

Initially, the Federalist Society, which organized the event, sought to relocate the venue as a means of ensuring safety. However, logistical issues regarding Shapiro’s availability meant the date could not be changed. An administrator associated with the law school, Penelope Fernandes, had earlier confirmed the arrangements for the speech but subsequently informed students that the event could not be held. This led to increased scrutiny regarding how the university handled events featuring controversial figures.

In correspondence, Associate Dean Megan McDermott stated that security concerns played a crucial role in the cancellation, emphasizing that the university’s security personnel would be “strained that week.” There was, however, an added layer of complexity when it was later revealed that the Federalist Society was permitted to conduct another event that same week, raising questions about possible selective treatment of speakers based on their viewpoints.

While administration efforts pointed to previously committed security resources for other events, McDermott clarified that the decision to cancel Shapiro’s speech was not a reflection of the speaker or the content of his program. Shapiro has criticized the decision, commenting that it exemplifies university officials succumbing to a “heckler’s veto,” a situation where the opposition silences a speaker through intimidation or a threat of disruption.

Despite the circumstances surrounding the cancellation, NYU later denied completely canceling the event, leading to further confusion. Shapiro has a documented history with cancel culture; he previously resigned from a role at Georgetown University in 2021 after receiving backlash for a tweet about President Biden’s Supreme Court nominee that was deemed controversial.

This tweet sparked discussions on racial identity and affirmative action, which ultimately led to significant criticism and statements against Shapiro. The evolving political dynamics at universities have led to conservatives increasingly experiencing the cancel culture tactics often reserved for criticism of left-leaning individuals.

The incident and subsequent cancellation highlight ongoing tensions and debates within academic institutions regarding free speech, particularly concerning speakers labeled as controversial. Observers, including free speech advocates like Robert Shibley from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, have denounced the cancellation as a clear example of disrupting a speaker based on personal viewpoints. This situation reflects a broader, ongoing concern about how universities are responding to potentially divisive topics and the implications for academic discourse.

The discussion about cancel culture continues to gain traction in various academic settings, illustrating the complex landscape of free speech, security, and the responsibilities institutions bear in fostering a diverse range of opinions.

Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic

HERE Resources

Legal Battle Emerges After Firing Over Social Media Post
USDA Allocates $18 Million for Farm to School Program

Additional Resources

• The College Fix: NYU Law School Cancels Speech About Cancel Culture
• Deseret News: RIP Cancel Culture
• New York Post: NYU College Republican President Ousted
• Washington Post: Hamas, Israel, and Cancel Culture
• Wikipedia: Cancel Culture