Los Angeles, January 4, 2026
Los Angeles Democrats have strongly condemned the recent U.S. military operation in Venezuela that led to the capture of President Nicolás Maduro. Local lawmakers raised concerns over the legality and congressional approval of the strike, arguing it undermines democratic principles and international law. This military action, ordered by President Trump, has generated widespread criticism both domestically and internationally, highlighting the complexities of foreign intervention and its implications for U.S. foreign policy.
Los Angeles Democrats Condemn U.S. Military Action in Venezuela
Discontent Following Military Operations
Los Angeles, CA – In the ongoing discussions surrounding U.S. military interventions, the recent operation in Venezuela, which resulted in the capture of President Nicolás Maduro, has ignited strong condemnation from Democratic lawmakers in Los Angeles County. This operation, ordered on January 3, 2026, by President Donald Trump, has raised significant questions regarding legality and efficacy, reflecting both national and international divides on how to handle foreign affairs.
Operation Overview
The U.S. military strike in Caracas led to the swift capture of President Maduro and his wife. Following the operation, President Trump announced that the United States would temporarily oversee the transitional government and oil fields of Venezuela, a move that aims to stabilize the region but raises complex international legal questions.
Local Democratic Leaders’ Concerns
A chorus of local Democratic representatives has voiced explicit criticism, raising concerns about the operation’s legality and the apparent absence of congressional approval, a requirement that they argue is fundamental to maintaining checks and balances in governance:
- Rep. Gil Cisneros pointed to the lack of congressional endorsement.
- Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove described the action as an illegal military strike without proper authorization.
- Rep. Maxine Waters expressed confusion regarding the operation’s legality and motivations.
- Rep. Nanette Barragán acknowledged the ideological opposition to Maduro but emphasized the need for constitutional compliance.
- Rep. Judy Chu raised concerns about the lack of public explanation regarding the military action.
- Rep. Jimmy Gomez reaffirmed that the strike lacked necessary congressional approval.
- Rep. George Whitesides highlighted the importance of consulting with Congress.
- Sen. Alex Padilla labeled the action as unlawful without clear objectives.
- Sen. Adam Schiff described the maneuver as a dangerous escalation undermining U.S. credibility.
International Perspectives on U.S. Actions
The military operation has not only drawn criticism from U.S. lawmakers but also sparked a global response. Various international leaders have expressed discontent over what they deem an unacceptable breach of sovereignty:
- Brazil’s President Lula da Silva condemned the U.S. actions as crossing a critical line.
- Mexico’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs warned that such actions threaten regional stability.
- China condemned the intervention as blatant military aggression.
- France’s Foreign Minister accused the U.S. of violating international law, asserting that sustainable political solutions cannot be imposed externally.
- EU Foreign Policy Chief underscored the imperative of respecting the UN Charter despite Maduro’s dubious legitimacy.
- Argentina’s President expressed support for U.S. actions, framing it as a step toward freedom.
Impact on U.S. Foreign Policy
This development adds another layer to the debate on U.S. foreign policy and military intervention. The criticism from both Democratic leaders and international allies underscores the challenges the U.S. faces in maintaining a coherent and effective approach to foreign crises. It raises the broader question of how military action impacts America’s global standing and its long-term strategic interests.
Conclusion
The U.S. military’s operation in Venezuela has ignited an intense dialogue about democratic principles, international law, and the bounds of executive authority. As local and global reactions unfold, this event will likely influence discussions on U.S. interventions and the importance of maintaining checks and balances in governance. Engaging with community insights and promoting informed dialogue about these issues remains crucial for Los Angeles residents and the broader American public.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the U.S. military operation in Venezuela?
The military operation, ordered by President Donald Trump on January 3, 2026, resulted in the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and aimed to stabilize the country’s government and oil fields.
Why are Los Angeles Democrats concerned about this operation?
Democratic lawmakers have raised concerns about the legality of the operation, highlighting the lack of congressional approval and questioning the justifications for military intervention.
What are international leaders saying about the U.S. actions?
International leaders have expressed both condemnation and support, with several criticizing the U.S. for violating sovereignty, while others, like Argentina’s President, view it as a step toward freedom.
| Key Features | Description |
|---|---|
| Operation Date | January 3, 2026 |
| Primary Focus | Capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro |
| Local Reactions | Strong criticism from Los Angeles Democrats regarding legality and authorization |
| International Responses | Condemnation from leaders in Brazil, China, and France; support from Argentina |
Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic
HERE Resources
U.S. Military Operation Captures Nicolás Maduro
Federal Appeals Court Orders Return of California National Guard
Federal Judge Orders End to National Guard Deployment in Los Angeles
Sacramento Man Arrested with Weapons and Police Gear
FBI Urges ICE Agents to Enhance Self-Identification Measures
Federal Judge Rules Against National Guard Deployment in Portland
Legal Challenges Over National Guard Deployment in Los Angeles
Controversy Erupts Over Call for Armed Resistance Against ICE
U.S. Air Force Academy Withdraws Honor for Charlie Kirk
Employment Rights Under Scrutiny as Fires Spread Following Tragic Death
Author: STAFF HERE LOS ANGELES WRITER
The LOS ANGELES STAFF WRITER represents the experienced team at HERELosAngeles.com, your go-to source for actionable local news and information in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, and beyond, specializing in "news you can use" with coverage of product reviews for personal and business needs, local business directories, politics, real estate trends, neighborhood insights, and state news affecting the area—with deep expertise from years of dedicated reporting and strong community input, including local press releases and business updates, while delivering top reporting on high-value events like the Academy Awards, LA Auto Show, and Los Angeles Marathon, extending coverage to key organizations such as the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce and the Los Angeles Tourism & Convention Board, plus leading businesses in entertainment and technology like Warner Bros. and SpaceX, and as part of the broader HERE network including HEREAnaheim.com , HERECostaMesa.com , HEREHuntingtonBeach.com , and HERESantaAna.com , providing comprehensive, credible insights into Southern California's dynamic landscape. HERE Anaheim HERE Beverly Hills HERE Coronado HERE Costa Mesa HERE Hollywood HERE Huntington Beach HERE Long Beach HERE Los Angeles HERE Mission Viejo HERE San Diego HERE Santa Ana
